6.7 C
London
Thursday, December 7, 2023
HomeDaily NewsBusinessKRAIL won the case against the Ibox Bank gambling license

KRAIL won the case against the Ibox Bank gambling license

Date:

Related stories

Australia Enacts Landmark Online Gambling Credit Card Ban: A Game-Changer in Responsible Gaming

Australia's Groundbreaking Move: Senate Passes Comprehensive Online Gambling Credit...

Brazilian Senate Delays Sports Betting Vote Amidst Online Casino Debate

In a significant development in Brazil's gambling sector, the...

Georgia Introduces Major Gambling Tax Increases and Strict Compliance Measures

Georgia is set to implement significant changes in its...

UK Gambling Commission Raises Alert on Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks

The UK Gambling Commission has issued a critical update,...

Denmark’s Spillemyndigheden Launches Educational Website on Responsible Gambling

In a significant move to combat problem gambling, Denmark's...

Ibox Bank has lost a legal case against the Ukrainian Gambling and Lottery Regulation Commission (KRAIL) regarding the cancellation of its gambling license. The bank had challenged KRAIL’s decision after a criminal conspiracy was uncovered by the Economic Security Bureau of Ukraine (ESBU).

According to the financial watchdog, over 20 Ibox subsidiaries and multiple gambling operators were involved in a tax evasion scheme. They were accused of accepting “miscoded” payments and bank transfers through unlicensed online casinos and sports betting operators, resulting in a tax evasion of over UAH 400m (€9.80m).

- Advertisement -

Users topped up their accounts on the sites by depositing cash at self-service terminals. The gaming businesses then credited the funds to their current accounts, even when the numbers didn’t coincide with stated revenue. Ibox was accused of handling UAH 20bn.

KRAIL cancelled Ibox’s gambling licence after carrying out its own probe, but the bank sued, claiming that the decision damaged its reputation. However, the Supreme Court said the regulator’s decision could not cause a loss of reputation since gambling services are not related to its activity as a bank.

Cash was deposited at self-service terminals by users to top up their accounts on the sites. The gaming businesses credited the funds to their current accounts, even when the numbers did not match the stated revenue. Ibox was accused of handling UAH 20bn in this manner.

Following its own investigation, KRAIL cancelled Ibox’s gambling license. The bank then filed a lawsuit claiming that the decision had damaged its reputation. However, the Supreme Court ruled that the regulator’s decision could not result in a loss of reputation since gambling services are not related to the bank’s activities.

Jerome McNamara
Jerome McNamara
Jerome, a valuable addition to the Gamingo.News team, brings with him extensive journalistic experience in the iGaming sector. His interest in the industry was sparked during his college years when he participated in local poker tournaments, eventually leading to his exposure to the burgeoning world of online poker and casino rooms. Jerome now utilizes his accumulated knowledge to fuel his passion for journalism, providing the team with the latest online scoops.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here