Connect with us


AGA Opposes GRIT Act: Federal Sports Betting Excise Tax Controversy



The American Gaming Association (AGA) stands firmly against the GRIT Act, triggering a nationwide debate on the allocation of federal sports betting excise tax. Discover the compelling arguments and implications in this contentious issue.

AGA’s Opposition to GRIT Act

In a significant move, the American Gaming Association (AGA) has publicly opposed the GRIT Act, a bill designed to allocate federal sports betting excise tax funds for responsible gaming (RG) projects. This stance places AGA in direct opposition to the National Council on Problem Gambling, a leading advocate for responsible gaming.

The AGA’s opposition is rooted in its long-standing commitment to repealing the federal excise tax on sports betting. This tax was initially introduced in the 1950s as a means to combat illegal gambling operations. However, AGA’s perspective has evolved over the years, viewing this tax as a relic of the past, particularly when organized crime controlled significant portions of the US gaming industry.

Antiquated Tax Policy and Competitive Disadvantage

Chris Cylke, AGA’s Senior Vice President of Government Relations, emphasized the historical context of the federal sports betting excise tax. He noted that the tax was conceived as a tool to prosecute illegal gambling operations, a scenario vastly different from today’s legal and regulated sports betting landscape.


Cylke argues that this outdated policy places the emerging legal market at a competitive disadvantage when compared to offshore illegal operators. These unregulated entities avoid taxation, preying on vulnerable customers while undercutting the legal industry’s ability to thrive.

The AGA believes that repealing the excise tax on legal sports betting operators is crucial to ensure a level playing field and effective regulation. They assert that Americans should be encouraged to participate in the protections offered by the regulated market, rather than being enticed by offshore illegal operators.

State Gaming Taxes and Problem Gambling Support

AGA further contends that state gaming taxes already play a substantial role in funding various problem gambling services. This includes support for those affected by problem gambling arising from the newly legalized sports betting and iGaming sectors.

They argue that there has never been a better time in history for attention and financial resources dedicated to addressing problem gambling. With the expansion of legal gambling activities, substantial investments have been made in support systems.


A Call for Bipartisan Legislation

In closing, AGA expresses its commitment to educating Congress on the necessity of enacting bipartisan legislation to repeal the excise tax on legal sports betting operators. Their goal is to ensure the effective migration of Americans into the regulated market’s protective embrace.

The AGA looks forward to collaborating with Senator Blumenthal, Representative Salinas, and other stakeholders to combat illegal gambling effectively. Their aim is to address problem gambling in ways that not only preserve good tax policy but also eliminate opportunities for criminals to exploit the system.

The GRIT Act and Its Objectives

The Gambling Addiction, Recovery, Investment, and Treatment (GRIT) Act, at the center of this controversy, seeks to divert 50% of the federal sports betting excise tax revenue. Of this, a significant 75% allocation is dedicated to addiction prevention and treatment, while the remaining 25% is earmarked for research grants.

This legislation has been introduced in both congressional chambers and has garnered considerable attention. It now rests in the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.


In summary, the AGA’s opposition to the GRIT Act sparks a crucial debate about the allocation of federal sports betting excise tax funds. The clash between preserving historical tax policy and fostering a fair, competitive, and well-regulated market raises essential questions about the future of responsible gaming in the United States.

Jerome, a valuable addition to the Gamingo.News team, brings with him extensive journalistic experience in the iGaming sector. His interest in the industry was sparked during his college years when he participated in local poker tournaments, eventually leading to his exposure to the burgeoning world of online poker and casino rooms. Jerome now utilizes his accumulated knowledge to fuel his passion for journalism, providing the team with the latest online scoops.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Maryland Bill Seeks to Ban Online Gambling on College Campuses



Maryland Bill Aims to Prohibit College Campus Gambling

As a seasoned gambling professional, staying abreast of legislative developments is paramount to understanding the evolving regulatory landscape. Maryland has recently garnered attention with the introduction of House Bill 1087, signalling a bold move to curtail online gambling activities on college campuses within the state. In this in-depth analysis, we delve into the intricacies of the proposed legislation, exploring its objectives, potential implications, and the broader implications for the gambling industry.

House Bill 1087, introduced in Maryland, seeks to prohibit online gambling on college campuses, underscoring concerns about the proliferation of gambling activities among students. The bill mandates the establishment of virtual perimeters, known as “geofences,” around college campuses to block access to online sportsbooks via cell phones. This proactive measure aims to mitigate the negative impact of gambling on campus communities and safeguard student welfare.

Under HB 1087, four-year public institutions, Baltimore City Community College, and local community colleges in Maryland are tasked with contracting geolocation service companies partnered with licensed sports betting operators. These institutions must implement the virtual perimeters by August 1, 2024, ensuring strict enforcement of the proposed ban on campus gambling. While the bill anticipates increased expenses for colleges, it asserts no revenue impact, emphasizing its primary objective of promoting a safe and responsible campus environment.

Despite the bill’s noble intentions, concerns have emerged regarding the practicality of enforcing geofences on college campuses. Towson University, a prominent public university in Maryland, has voiced apprehensions about the feasibility of implementing geolocation restrictions effectively. Challenges such as geolocation accuracy, mobile device settings, ethical considerations, and private network usage pose significant obstacles to enforcement, raising questions about the efficacy of the proposed legislation.


Maryland’s foray into sports betting in November 2022 marked a significant milestone in the state’s gambling landscape, with ten operators, including industry giants like FanDuel and ESPN Bet, entering the market. However, the introduction of HB 1087 underscores a shift in regulatory focus towards addressing emerging concerns surrounding gambling accessibility and its potential impact on vulnerable populations, particularly college students.

As the debate surrounding House Bill 1087 unfolds, it prompts crucial discussions about the intersection of gambling, education, and regulatory oversight. While advocates argue for stringent measures to combat problem gambling and protect student well-being, critics raise valid concerns about the practicality and effectiveness of geofencing solutions. Ultimately, Maryland’s legislative initiative serves as a microcosm of broader efforts to strike a balance between consumer protection and industry growth in the ever-evolving landscape of online gambling regulation.

Continue Reading


Gamingo.News stands as a premier digital destination dedicated to delivering top-tier news and insights in the gaming and gambling industry. This specialized media outlet garners the attention of over 120,000 readers each month, providing them with engaging content, current news, and in-depth analyses.
The platform offers extensive coverage of various facets of the gaming world, including both online and brick-and-mortar gaming, wagering, esports, updates on regulations and compliance, as well as technological innovations. Regular content includes daily news stories, press releases, unique interviews, and comprehensive reports on events.
Moreover, Gamingo.News organizes webinars pertinent to the industry and offers detailed reports, establishing itself as a comprehensive information source for those interested in learning about gaming market operators, suppliers, regulators, and professional services. The portal's main objective is to keep its large audience informed about the latest news, trends, and developments in the gaming and gambling sectors. It focuses particularly on the European igaming market but also covers significant global news, proving to be an invaluable tool for gaming professionals, operators, and enthusiasts.

For inquiries, reach out at:

For editorial or PR submissions, contact:

Copyright © 2024 Gamingo.News.