UKGC: “We can’t yet reliably quantify the illegal online gambling market”

The UK regulator just acknowledged a major gap: it still doesn’t know how big the illegal online gambling market actually is. In its latest report, the UK Gambling Commission admits it is “not yet in a position to make a robust and reliable estimate” of the size of the illegal online gambling market in Great Britain. As a gambling-industry expert, I find this admission both worrisome and revealing. It shows the scale of the challenge, but also opens a strategic window for operators and regulators. Read on to explore what the UKGC found, why measuring the black market is so hard, and what this means for the regulated industry going forward. Key Points

• The UKGC is concluding its four-part “Estimating the size of the illegal online gambling market” research series.
• It states that reliable data is scarce and estimates require significant assumptions, limiting confidence.
• The regulator likens the difficulty to other illicit markets such as illegal tobacco.
• While no total estimate is given, the UKGC says it has improved its evidence base and gained new insights into consumer behaviour.
• Prior independent research (e.g., by Betting and Gaming Council) estimates around £2.7 billion staked annually on illegal sites in the UK.
• Enforcement activity continues: URL takedowns, partnerships with payment firms and increased disruption tools are part of the response.

UKGC Admits: We Cannot Yet Accurately Measure the Illegal Online Gambling Market

The online gambling landscape in the UK is shifting fast: newer platforms, payments methods, crypto flows and offshore brands make it tougher to map the “illegal” portion of the market. The UKGC’s recent admission that it cannot yet reliably estimate the size of the illegal online segment is striking. From my perspective, this open acknowledgment is as important as any number they might publish in future.

Why Measuring the Illegal Market Is Tough

First, the very nature of unlicensed online gambling resists straightforward data capture. The UKGC describes how assumptions are required when combining web-traffic data, operator data and inferred spend. Secondly, consumer behaviour is fluid: many unlicensed players may use VPNs, multiple devices or payment methods which elude conventional tracking. Thirdly, legal distinctions blur: some offshore sites may claim to operate under non-UK licences, others may present themselves as “trading platforms” rather than betting operators—complicating definition and classification.

What the UKGC Has Found

Despite the inability to give a firm number, the UKGC reports progress. It says its evidence base has improved and it now understands better the drivers of illegal market use: for example, many users of unlicensed sites are unaware they are gambling illegally, while others are self-excluded from regulated licences. The regulator also points out that it found no indication of sustained growth in illegal gambling where data is robust—but emphasises the threat remains large.

Independent Estimates Put the Risk in Perspective

While the regulator remains cautious, independent research offers some benchmarks. The Betting & Gaming Council’s survey (conducted by Frontier Economics) estimated up to £2.7 billion staked per year on illegal online sites—about 2 % of total online stakes. That equates to potential tax losses and, more importantly, points to harm risks for consumers operating outside regulated protections.

Strategic Implications for Operators

From my vantage:

• Licensed operators should see this moment as an opportunity. With regulators focused on disruption, compliant firms can emphasise their player-protection credentials.
• Payment processors, affiliates and technology vendors must recognise increased regulatory scrutiny. The UKGC is signalling it wants to map the ecosystem.
• For new entrants or offshore platforms targeting UK consumers, the message is clear: The regulator may not yet publish full numbers, but enforcement capability is rising. Operating unlicensed or offering UK access is high risk.
• Regulators and governments may use improved data in the future to design tax regimes, regulatory interventions or licensing reforms—meaning long-term strategic risk for the sector.

My Analytical View

In my professional assessment, the UKGC’s admission represents a turning point. Regulatory agencies seldom say “we don’t know” so openly. By doing so, the UKGC is signalling both realism and intent: that measuring the black market is hard, but they are building the tools and data to do it. For the regulated sector, it means we are entering a phase where data, transparency and oversight will increasingly differentiate credible operators from the grey or illegal market. The UK Gaming Commission’s latest statement—that it cannot yet reliably estimate the size of the illegal online gambling market—is more than a qualification. It underlines the complexity of the challenge and the need for stronger data, smarter enforcement and deeper collaboration across industry, regulators and financial intermediaries. As a professional in the field, I believe this is a crucial inflection point: the black market may be invisible in total size today, but it will not remain invisible to regulators or operators committed to compliant growth. Tags: UKGC, illegal gambling market, black market gambling UK, unlicensed online gambling, gambling regulation UK

📢 Join the Conversation!

Want to share your thoughts or ask questions about our latest articles? Stay connected and be part of the discussion by joining our Telegram and WhatsApp channels!

🔹 Get real-time updates
🔹 Share insights with industry peers
🔹 Ask questions & get expert answers

👉 Join us on Telegram 👉 Join us on WhatsApp

Let’s keep the conversation going!