UK regulator suspends Spribe’s hosting licence

One of the rising stars in gaming-software supply just hit a regulatory roadblock. The UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) has ordered Spribe OÜ to halt all hosting activity in Great Britain with immediate effect, citing “serious” non-compliance with hosting-licence requirements. From my vantage as a gambling-industry regulation writer, this signals that even software suppliers — beyond operators — must meet tough UK standards. It’s a wake-up call for the supply chain. Read on to understand what hosting licences mean, what went wrong for Spribe, and how this affects the broader supplier ecosystem.

Key Points

• Spribe OÜ holds software-licence number 57302 issued by the UKGC.
• The UKGC suspended Spribe’s hosting licence activity on grounds of suitability and serious non-compliance.
• “Hosting” means supplying software via your servers so players access games via operator platforms — a distinct licence tier.
• Under the Gambling Act 2005 Section 33, offering gambling facilities without a valid licence is a criminal offence.
• The supplier cannot resume UK hosting until the suspension is reviewed and a proper hosting licence granted by the regulator.

UKGC Suspends Spribe’s Hosting Licence — A Core Supplier Put on Regulatory Notice

In the regulated UK market, the spotlight often falls on operators — the bets, the promotions, the licences. But now a supplier has become the focus, and the message is clear: compliance runs through every layer of the value chain.

What Hosting Licensing Means

Under UK regulation, software providers who host games on their own servers while allowing operators to connect via website or app must hold a host licence (in addition to a software licence). The UKGC’s guidance stipulates that without this hosting licence, the supplier is in breach. Once Spribe’s hosting licence was suspended, it meant they must immediately cease supplying and hosting games for UK-licensed operators. Operators relying on those hosted games must switch off or move to alternative certified suppliers.

What Went Wrong for Spribe

According to the UKGC statement, the suspension was required on “grounds of suitability” and “serious non-compliance” with hosting requirements. While the regulator hasn’t published all the details yet, it underscores a supplier failing to meet the high standard expected in Britain. Spribe had built a strong reputation. Its flagship game avatar, Aviator, became hugely popular across Europe and with UK operators. iGB+1 It holds a software-licence and for a time positioned itself as compliant. However, hosting is a different layer — and the UKGC found Spribe lacking in that layer.

Impact on the Supplier and Operator Ecosystem

From my professional analysis:

• Suppliers are not untouchable. This enforcement shows that even highly reputed game-studios must maintain licence standards, audits, infrastructure and transparency just like operators.
• Operators have exposure. UK-licensed operators using Spribe-hosted games now must validate their compliance path. If they continue using the games, they may risk regulatory breach themselves.
• The supply chain risk rises. When multiple suppliers exist, regulators may increasingly audit hosting arrangements, segregation of duties, server location, data-flows and contractual clarity.
• Player protection and integrity matter. Hosting carries responsibility — uptime, game-fairness, remote-access control — the regulator’s concerns likely spanned these elements.
• Regulatory signalling is strong. The UKGC is reaffirming the primary message: every licence subject must be maintained. Hosting is not a side-note.

My View

Fundamentally, I believe this case marks a turning point. Suppliers used to benefit from “behind-the-scenes” status. Now the market is mature; regulators expect visibility and accountability across all nodes in the value chain. From my vantage, operators should revisit their supplier-risk framework. Suppliers must provide documented hosting-licence status, data-hosting location, business continuity plans, audit trails and clear escalation procedures. If a supplier enters the UK market, they must already hold or be actively working towards a hosting licence (if applicable). For the UK regulator, this enforcement acts as a deterrent. It sends a message: the big licence holder doesn’t get a free pass. Hosting non-compliance may trigger review, suspension, even revocation — and hence reputational damage. The UK Gambling Commission’s suspension of Spribe OÜ’s hosting activity in the UK is a clear demonstration that supplier compliance matters just as much as operator compliance. The regulator expects high standards, and hosting licences are a critical element. From my professional standpoint, this episode reveals how the regulated iGaming market is evolving: transparency, accountability and compliance are now definitive factors right across the ecosystem. Suppliers, operators and regulators alike must treat licence conditions, hosting structures and technical governance as non-optional. Tags: Spribe, UKGamblingCommission, HostingLicenceSuspension, UKGamingSuppliers, ComplianceBreach

📢 Join the Conversation!

Want to share your thoughts or ask questions about our latest articles? Stay connected and be part of the discussion by joining our Telegram and WhatsApp channels!

🔹 Get real-time updates
🔹 Share insights with industry peers
🔹 Ask questions & get expert answers

👉 Join us on Telegram 👉 Join us on WhatsApp

Let’s keep the conversation going!