Netherlands’ KSA unveils new exploitation licence

A landmark shift in Dutch gambling regulation is now on the horizon.

The Kansspelautoriteit (KSA) has announced a new type of exploitation licence for land-based gaming venues designed to replace or supplement existing permits.

From my perspective as a gambling regulation expert, this signals a major turning point. Operators must adapt to fixed-term licences, tighter oversight and greater regulatory flex.

Read on to get my full analysis — why the change matters, how it affects operators and what to expect as the Dutch market evolves.

Key Points

• • The KSA is rolling out a new licence category for land-based gaming operations in the Netherlands.
  • Under the new framework, licences may be time-limited rather than indefinite, enabling periodic reviews and re-authorisations.
  • The aim is to improve transparency, strengthen regulatory control, and ensure fair access for prospective operators.
  • While the focus is on land-based venues (slot halls, machine operators), the shift may impact hybrid or online segments through similar oversight approaches.
  • Transitional arrangements will cover existing licence-holders during the change-over period.

Dutch Regulator Introduces Fixed-Term Exploitation Licence — A New Era for Land-Based Gaming

The Dutch gambling regulatory world is quietly entering a new phase. Recently the KSA announced it will introduce a new type of exploitation licence for land-based venues—slot halls, gaming machine operations and similar facilities. From my experience, this change is less cosmetic and more structural in nature.

What exactly is changing?

Under the current regime, land-based operators often hold indefinite licences or multiyear permits. The KSA’s new regime will allow (or require) fixed-term licences with periodic review. This means the regulator gains greater flexibility to reassess operators, enforce standards, or decline renewals when necessary.

For example, the licence might cover 3-5 years, after which the operator must apply again, demonstrate integrity, compliance and sustainable operations. In practice, this shifts the balance of power somewhat: operators will be under continuous performance and compliance scrutiny rather than relying on “set-and-forget” permit models.

Why is this happening?

From a regulatory viewpoint, several forces are driving the change:

• Scarce permit allocations: Land-based gaming locations in the Netherlands are finite. A fixed-term licence helps the KSA manage allocations, prevent stagnation and enable new entrants.
• Transparency and oversight: The regulator pointed out that variable licence terms and indefinite durations reduce incentives for ongoing compliance. Time-limited renewals increase pressure to maintain standards.
• Aligning land-based and online regimes: While the new licence is aimed at venues, the broader trend is seen in online regulation too (see new exit-plan, risk-analysis rules for remote licences).
• Modernising the sector: The Netherlands is repositioning its gambling market as increasingly regulated, controlled and future-proof. Fixed-term licences reflect that ambition.

Impact on Operators

From my vantage, this is important for any operator currently in the Dutch land-based space—or planning to enter. Key implications include:

• Renewal risk: Operators must now prepare for renewal cycles. Performance, compliance history and consumer protection practices will matter more than before.
• Exit-planning and sustainability: The KSA hints at licence conditions such as exit-plans, sustainable operations and documented business continuity. Operators will need to demonstrate readiness.
• Increased compliance cost: Running to a fixed-term renewal means systems, audits and risk analyses may become more frequent. Some cost burden may shift.
• Competitive Fairness: A timed licence regime levels the playing field. It prevents operators sitting indefinitely without performance expectations—or blocking new entrants.
• Transition stress: Existing licence-holders may face transitional arrangements. They should proactively plan adjustments rather than wait for regulation to enforce change.

Broader Sector Significance

While the change is focused on land-based, I believe the ripple effects will extend to hybrid and online segments. The Dutch regulator’s draft rules for remote licences (effective 1 January 2026) already introduce exit-plans and renewals.

Operators should interpret this as a signal: regulatory regimes are shifting globally toward dynamic licences, not static. The era of “get a licence and run for ten years without review” is fading.

The Netherlands’ move can influence other jurisdictions. If a regulated market like the Netherlands adopts fixed-term licences and more frequent oversight, operators entering other markets must adapt to similar expectations sooner rather than later.

My Analytical View

In my professional opinion, this is a wise move by the KSA. It addresses key regulatory risks: stagnation, inadequate oversight, and barriers to renewal or market entry.

However, execution will be critical. If the KSA applies renewal standards too harshly or unpredictably, operators may feel destabilised—risking investment, exit from the market, or shift to unlicensed operations. Balance must be struck between certainty (so operators have confidence) and conditional accountability (so regulators maintain control).

For operators, my advice is straightforward: initiate a licence readiness programme now. Review compliance, documentation, exit-planning, risk analysis and sustainability strategy. Being ahead of the renewal wave gives competitive advantage.

The Netherlands’ gambling regulator KSA is introducing a new type of fixed-term exploitation licence for land-based gaming venues. This change forms a key part of the regulator’s strategy to modernise licensing, increase transparency and strengthen oversight.

For operators this means preparing for renewal cycles, compliance reviews and possible exit planning. The broader signal is clear: regulatory frameworks now favour dynamic, performance-oriented licensing rather than indefinite permits.

From my perspective, this regulatory shift marks a significant milestone. It sends a clear message: if you are operating in the Dutch gaming market—or intend to—be ready not for lifetime licences, but for continuous accountability and renewal.

Tags: KSA, NetherlandsGambling, LandBasedGaming, ExploitationLicence, RegulatoryReform, GamingMachines

📢 Join the Conversation!

Want to share your thoughts or ask questions about our latest articles? Stay connected and be part of the discussion by joining our Telegram and WhatsApp channels!

👉 Join us on Telegram 👉 Join us on WhatsApp

Let’s keep the conversation going!